Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there a strategic mechanism that explains role-contingent differences in conflict behavior? I sketch a theory in which differences in optimal behavior for attackers and defenders arise under initially symmetric conditions through the dynamic accumulation of differences in the distributions of traits in the subpopulations of potential opponents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communicative Action, Strategic Action, and Inter-Group Dialogue.Michael Rabinder James - 2003 - European Journal of Political Theory 2 (2):157-182.
The Choice for CSR.Christian R. Thauer - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (5):27-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
4 (#1,638,237)

6 months
1 (#1,507,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references