Just War contra Drone Warfare

Conatus 8 (2):217-239 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I present a two-pronged argument for the immorality of contemporary, asymmetric drone warfare, based on my new interpretations of the just war principles of “proportionality” and “moral equivalence of combatants” (MEC). The justification for these new interpretations is that drone warfare continues to this day, having survived despite arguments against it that are based on traditional interpretations of just war theory (including one from Michael Walzer). On the basis of my argument, I echo Harry Van der Linden’s call for “an international treaty banning all weaponized UAV [uninhabited aerial vehicles].”

Similar books and articles

Armed Drone Warfare.Robert Paul Churchill - 2016 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 23 (2):71-81.
A good guy with a drone: On the ethics of drone warfare.Emil Archambault - 2020 - Contemporary Political Theory 19 (3):169-175.
Drones, Vertical Mediation, and the Targeted Class.Lisa Parks - 2016 - Feminist Studies 42 (1):227-235.
The ethics of drone warfare.Aleksandar Fatic - 2017 - Filozofija I Društvo 28 (2):349-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-30

Downloads
283 (#70,792)

6 months
188 (#15,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua M. Hall
University of Alabama, Birmingham

Citations of this work

Add more citations