- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings
Hans Vilhelm Hansen & Robert C. Pinto (eds.)
University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press (1995)
Abstract
A major purpose of this book is to make the post-Hamblin work on fallacies available to a wider audience in a single, convenient volume.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, xi + 356 pp., $47.50, $18.95 paper. [REVIEW]David Crossley - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (2):387-.
Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.
Critique of an epistemic account of fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):263-272.
Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).
Fallacies of Division.Robert K. Meyer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:71-80.
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
Getting Our Minds Out of the Gutter: Fallacies that Foul Our Discourse (and Virtues that Clean it Up).Robert K. Garcia & Nathan L. King - 2013 - In Michael W. Austin (ed.), Virtues in Action: New Essays in Applied Virtue Theory. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 190-206.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-09
Downloads
74 (#222,915)
6 months
17 (#148,261)
2014-03-09
Downloads
74 (#222,915)
6 months
17 (#148,261)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.
Educating for Intellectual Virtue: a critique from action guidance.Ben Kotzee, J. Adam Carter & Harvey Siegel - 2019 - Episteme:1-23.
The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy'.Hans Vilhelm Hansen - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (2):133-155.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-pjbg5 uwo