Abstract

So far, people tend to "Paris Manuscripts" theory of alienation due to alienated labor. In fact it is not the only means "the first manuscript," the alienation of labor, but also refers to the "Mill commentary" in the exchanges of alienation. Exchanges out of alienation Marx's self-alienation isolation logic, to the complex logic of the key social relations, but also the Marxist concept of social construction and premise of historical materialism. Therefore, the interaction level is higher than in the ideological alienation alienation of labor, "Mueller commentary" in theory than the "first manuscript" mature, we should follow the "first manuscript," the former "Mill commentary" in the literature after school sequential read "Paris Manuscripts." If Marx in his early intellectual development in the process of a fundamental change in the words, "Muller commentary" is a turning point in this transition. Until now, it is common that the theory of alienation in Paris Manuscript is attributed to the alienated labor. Actually, it not only refers to the alienated labor in The First Manuscript, but also refers to the alienation of commerce in Glossen zu James Mill. The construction of the theory of the alienatinn of commerce is the critical step for Marx tn turn to the concept of the complex social relations from the concept of one man's self-alienation. The theory of the alienation of commerce is also the premise for Marx to construct his concept of the society as well as his historical materialism. Therefore, theoretically speaking, the theory of the alienation of commerce is deeper than that of the alienated labor, Glossen zu James Mill is more mature than The First Manuscript. We should follow the order confirmed by the research of literature when we try to explain Paris Manuscript. If there was a fundamental change in the development of the early thoughts of Man, Glossen zu James Mill is the turning point of the change