|Abstract||Prince of Networks is the first treatment of Bruno Latour specifically as a philosopher. It has been eagerly awaited by readers of both Latour and Harman since their public discussion at the London School of Economics in February 2008. Part One covers four key works that display Latour’s underrated contributions to metaphysics: Irreductions, Science in Action, We Have Never Been Modern, and Pandora’s Hope. Harman contends that Latour is one of the central figures of contemporary philosophy, with a highly original ontology centered in four key concepts: actants, irreduction, translation, and alliance. In Part Two, Harman summarizes Latour’s most important philosophical insights, including his status as the first ‘secular occasionalist.’ The problem of translation between entities is no longer solved by the fiat of God (Malebranche) or habit (Hume), but by local mediators. Working from his own ‘object-oriented’ perspective, Harman also criticizes the Latourian focus on the relational character of actors at the expense of their cryptic autonomous reality. This book forms a remarkable interface between Latour’s Actor-Network Theory and the Speculative Realism of Harman and his confederates. It will be of interest to anyone concerned with the emergence of new trends in the humanities following the long postmodernist interval.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Buy the book||$13.34 used (47% off) $15.29 new (39% off) $15.37 direct from Amazon (39% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bruno Latour, Graham Harman & Peter Erdélyi (2011). The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Zero Books.
John Hartmann (2010). Review of Graham Harman, Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Kinesis 36 (2):65-70.
Graham Harman (2007). The Importance of Bruno Latour for Philosophy. Cultural Studies Review 13 (1):31-49.
Jeff Kochan (2010). Latour's Heidegger. Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Bruno Latour (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press.
Graham Harman (2003). Return of the Reality Principle. Al-Ahram Weekly (668).
Jeff Kochan (2006). Rescuing the Gorgias From Latour. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.
Nicholas J. Rowland, Jan-Hendrik Passoth & Alexander B. Kinney (2011). Latour's Greatest Hits, Reassembled: Review of Bruno Latour's Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. [REVIEW] Spontaneous Generations 5 (1).
Dean Pierides (2012). Object-Oriented Sociology and Organizing in the Face of Emergency: Bruno Latour, Graham Harman and the Material Turn. British Journal of Sociology 63 (4):662-679.
Bruno Latour (1988). The Author Rebounds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 2 (2):183.
Bruno Latour (1987). The Author Responds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 1 (4):347 – 350.
Barbara Tuchanska (1995). Book Review:We Have Never Been Modern Bruno Latour. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 62 (2):350-.
Srikanth Mallavarapu & Amit Prasad (2006). Facts, Fetishes, and the Parliament of Things: Is There Any Space for Critique? Social Epistemology 20 (2):185 – 199.
Graham Harman (2006). Bruno Latour and the Politics of Nature. In Sonja Servomaa (ed.), Humanity at the Turning Point: Rethinking Nature, Culture, and Freedom. Renvall.
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2012-01-06
Total downloads8 ( #122,917 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?