Can a Latin Trinity Be Social? A Response to Scott M. Williams

Faith and Philosophy 35 (3):356-366 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scott Williams’s Latin Social model of the Trinity holds that the trinitarian persons have between them a single set of divine mental powers and a single set of divine mental acts. He claims, nevertheless, that on his view the persons are able to use indexical pronouns such as “I.” This claim is examined and is found to be mistaken.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

07397046

DOI

10.5840/faithphil2018613104

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Unity of Action in a Latin Social Model of the Trinity.Scott M. Williams - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (3):321-346.
Il dibattito sulla Trinità nella filosofia analitica della religione.Daniele Bertini - 2015 - In Ivan Pozzoni (ed.), Frammenti di filosofia contemporanea. Limina Mentis. pp. 111-135.
Indexicals and the Trinity: Two Non-Social Models.Scott M. Williams - 2013 - Journal of Analytic Theology 1:74-94.
A Supervenient Trinity: An Alternative to L atin and Social Trinitarian Theories.Matthew Zaro Fisher - 2015 - Heythrop Journal 57 (6):964-973.
A Supervenient Trinity: An Alternative to Latin and Social Trinitarian Theories.Matthew Zaro Fisher - 2016 - Heythrop Journal 57 (6):964-973.
Time Travel and the Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):313-324.
The Trinity and Extended Simples.Martin Pickup - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):414-440.
A Modern Look at Social Trinitarianism.T. Porter Christopher - 2017 - Quaerens Deum 3 (1).
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
2000 Representations of Zen: A social and institutional history of Soto Zen Buddhism in Edo Japan. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University. Duncan Ryiken Williams Trinity College. [REVIEW]Duncan Ryfiken Williams - 2000 - Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 28:1-2.
Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent.H. E. Baber - 2008 - Sophia 47 (2):149-160.
A Leftovian Trinity?William Hasker - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
On Hasker on Leftow on Hasker on Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):334-339.
“The Trinity Is Our Social Program”: The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Shape of Social Engagement.Miroslav Volf - 1998 - Modern Theology 14 (3):403-423.
A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity.John Zeis - 1993 - Sophia 32 (1):45 - 55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-14

Downloads
35 (#456,715)

6 months
8 (#361,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

Philosophy and Christian theology.Michael Murray - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references