“Latin” or “Conciliar,” but Still Incoherent

Faith and Philosophy 38 (4):540-545 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

HaskerI argue that Scott M. Williams’s “Latin/Conciliar Social Trinity” is unable to give a coherent account of some undisputed divine actions. The reason for this lies in Williams’s failure to recognize the different senses in which the trinitarian Persons can be said to have “powers.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the Latin Social Trinity Defensible?William Hasker - 2021 - Faith and Philosophy 38 (4):505-513.
Qua Solution, 0-Qua Has Problems.Andrew Tedder, Grace Paterson & David Ripley - 2020 - Journal of Analytic Theology 8 (1):405-411.
On Hasker on Leftow on Hasker on Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):334-339.
In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay. By Timothy Pawl. [REVIEW]Kenneth Boyce - 2017 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):495-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-15

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references