David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Epistemology 23 (1):57-78 (2009)
In the interwar period there was a significant school of thought that repudiated Einstein's theory of relativity on the grounds that it contained elementary inconsistencies. Some of these critics held extreme right-wing and anti-Semitic views, and this has tended to discredit their technical objections to relativity as being scientifically shallow. This paper investigates an alternative possibility: that the critics were right and that the success of Einstein's theory in overcoming them was due to its strengths as an ideology rather than as a science. The clock paradox illustrates how relativity theory does indeed contain inconsistencies that make it scientifically problematic. These same inconsistencies, however, make the theory ideologically powerful. The implications of this argument are examined with respect to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper's accounts of the philosophy of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
K. R. Popper (1966). Conjectures and Refutations. Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
David Zaret (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 90 (1):146-149.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Gimbel (2012). Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hakan Tornebohm (1955). Comments on Professor Grünbaum's: "The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity". Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231 - 232.
Håkan Törnebohm (1955). Comments on Professor Grünbaum's: "The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity". Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231-232.
Adolf Grunbaum (1954). The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 21 (3):249 - 253.
Boris Leaf (1955). The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 22 (1):45-52.
Adolf Grünbaum (1954). The Clock Paradox in the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 21 (3):249-253.
Geoffrey Builder (1959). The Resolution of the Clock Paradox. Philosophy of Science 26 (2):135-144.
Håkan Törnebohm (1963). The Clock Paradox and the Notion of Clock Retardation in the Special Theory of Relativity. Theoria 29 (1):79-90.
Carlo B. Giannoni (1973). Special Relativity in Accelerated Systems. Philosophy of Science 40 (3):382-392.
Added to index2010-07-12
Total downloads96 ( #47,741 of 1,940,950 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,411 of 1,940,950 )
How can I increase my downloads?