Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories
OUP Oxford (2009)
|Abstract||Gauge theories have provided our most successful representations of the fundamental forces of nature. How, though, do such representations work? Interpretations of gauge theory aim to answer this question. Through understanding how a gauge theory's representations work, we are able to say what kind of world our gauge theories reveal to us. A gauge theory's representations are mathematical structures. These may be transformed among themselves while certain features remain the same. Do the representations related by such a gauge transformation merely offer alternative ways of representing the very same situation? If so, then gauge symmetry is a purely formal property since it reflects no corresponding symmetry in nature. Gauging What's Real describes the representations provided by gauge theories in both classical and quantum physics. Richard Healey defends the thesis that gauge transformations are purely formal symmetries of almost all the classes of representations provided by each of our theories of fundamental forces. He argues that evidence for classical gauge theories of forces (other than gravity) gives us reason to believe that loops rather than points are the locations of fundamental properties. In addition to exploring the prospects of extending this conclusion to the quantum gauge theories of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics, Healey assesses the difficulties faced by attempts to base such ontological conclusions on the success of these theories.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Healey (2007). Gauging What's Real. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Bain (2008). Richard Healey:Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories,:Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories. Philosophy of Science 75 (4):479-485.
John Earman (2002). Gauge Matters. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S209--20.
Richard Healey (2004). Gauge Theories and Holisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):619-642.
Holger Lyre (2001). The Principles of Gauging. Philosophy of Science 68 (3):S371-S381.
Richard Healey (2010). Gauge Symmetry and the Theta Vacuum. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer.
Steven Weinstein (1999). Gravity and Gauge Theory. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):155.
D. John Baker (2010). Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Gauge Theories, by Richard Healey. Mind 119 (474):490-494.
Holger Lyre (2004). Holism and Structuralism in (1) Gauge Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):643-670.
Alexandre Guay (2008). A Partial Elucidation of the Gauge Principle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (2):346-363.
Alexandre Guay (2008). Conceptual Foundations of Yang–Mills Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (3):687-693.
Richard Healey (2001). On the Reality of Gauge Potentials. Philosophy of Science 68 (4):432-455.
Chuang Liu (1996). Gauge Invariance, Cauchy Problem, Indeterminism, and Symmetry Breaking. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):79.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?