Graduate studies at Western
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):257 – 268 (1991)
|Abstract||Abstract One cannot discount experimental errors and turn the attention to the logicomathematical structure of a physical theory without distorting the nature of the scientific method. The occurrence of errors in experiments constitutes an inherent feature of the attempt to test theories in the physical world. This feature deserves proper attention which has been neglected. An attempt is made to address this problem|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven J. Jensen (2008). Of Gnome and Gnomes. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):411-428.
Stephen Sheard (2001). Slain God: A Symbolist Perspective on the New Science and Related Management Theorization. Emergence 3 (2):78-112.
Suitbert Ertel (2005). Are ESP Test Results Stochastic Artifacts? Brugger & Taylor's Claims Under Scrutiny. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (3):61-80.
Joseph D. Sneed (1966). Von Neumann's Argument for the Projection Postulate. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
Giora Hon (2004). Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Casting Constraints on All-Embracing Concepts. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 9 (1):25-64.
Kerry Walters (1997). The Case of the Slain President. Teaching Philosophy 20 (1):35-47.
Bruce R. Dain (2002). A Hideous Monster of the Mind: American Race Theory in the Early Republic. Harvard University Press.
Giora Hon (1989). Towards a Typology of Experimental Errors: An Epistemological View. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (4):469-504.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,563 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?