Evolution: Limited and Predictable or Unbounded and Lawless?

Biological Theory 11 (4):187-191 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this brief commentary I compare and contrast two different views of evolution: one of limited (convergent) evolution and mathematical predictability, and one of unbounded diversity and no entailing laws. Clearly these opposing views cannot both be true at the same time. Their disagreement seems to rest on different underlying assumptions, and the challenge is to see if they can be reconciled.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relative lawlessness in intuitionistic analysis.Joan Rand Moschovakis - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):68-88.
More about relatively lawless sequences.Joan Rand Moschovakis - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):813-829.
Spreads or choice sequences?H. C. M. De Swart - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):203-213.
Forcing closed unbounded sets.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):643-657.
Filters on Computable Posets.Steffen Lempp & Carl Mummert - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (4):479-485.
Groupwise density cannot be much bigger than the unbounded number.Saharon Shelah - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (4):340-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-06

Downloads
24 (#675,021)

6 months
12 (#242,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?