Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):97-110 (2009)
|Abstract||Two experiments are reported which investigate the factors that influence how persuaded mathematicians are by visual arguments. We demonstrate that if a visual argument is accompanied by a passage of text which describes the image, both research-active mathematicians and successful undergraduate mathematics students perceive it to be significantly more persuasive than if no text is given. We suggest that mathematicians’ epistemological concerns about supporting a claim using visual images are less prominent when the image is described in words. Finally we suggest that empirical studies can make a useful contribution to our understanding of mathematical practice.|
|Keywords||Belief Conviction Experimental methods Persuasion Visual arguments|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Qasim Zaidi & A. Fuzz Griffiths (2002). Generic Assumptions Shared by Visual Perception and Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):215-216.
Jessica Evans & Stuart Hall (eds.) (1999). Visual Culture: The Reader. Sage Publications in Association with the Open University.
Diego E. Machuca (2009). Argumentative Persuasiveness in Ancient Pyrrhonism. Méthexis 22:101-26.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2001). Visual Perception is Not Visual Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):985-985.
Irina Starikova (2010). Why Do Mathematicians Need Different Ways of Presenting Mathematical Objects? The Case of Cayley Graphs. Topoi 29 (1):41-51.
Andrew Arana (2009). Review of M. Giaquinto's Visual Thinking in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Analysis 69:401-403.
M. Giaquinto (2007). Visual Thinking in Mathematics: An Epistemological Study. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?