David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Although there is universal consensus both in the science education literature and in the science standards documents to the effect that students should learn not only the content of science but also its nature, there is little agreement about what that nature is. This led many science educators to adopt what is sometimes called “the consensus view” about the nature of science (NOS), whose goal is to teach students only those characteristics of science on which there is wide consensus. This is an attractive view, but it has some shortcomings and weaknesses. In this article we present and defend an alternative approach based on the notion of family resemblance. We argue that the family resemblance approach is superior to the consensus view in several ways, which we discuss in some detail
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Pelczar (2000). Wittgensteinian Semantics. Noûs 34 (4):483–516.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Michael Martin (1986). Science Education and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 15 (2):99-108.
John Halliday (2001). Reason, Education and Liberalism: Family Resemblance Within an Overlapping Consensus. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):225-234.
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast, Zahra Niknam & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast, The Sophisticated Inductive Approach and Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast, Zahra Niknam & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast (2011). The Sophisticated Inductive Approach and Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30:1365-1369.
Barry Hoffmaster (1981). Family Medicine as a Social Science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):387-410.
Garth D. Benson (1989). The Misrepresentation of Science by Philosophers and Teachers of Science. Synthese 80 (1):107 - 119.
Ingo Brigandt (2013). Intelligent Design and the Nature of Science: Philosophical and Pedagogical Points. In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Springer. 205-238.
Sunil Vadera, Andres Rodriguez, Enrique Succar & Jia Wu (2008). Using Wittgenstein's Family Resemblance Principle to Learn Exemplars. Foundations of Science 13 (1):67-74.
Added to index2010-08-20
Total downloads42 ( #46,494 of 1,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,935 of 1,411,338 )
How can I increase my downloads?