David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):441-451 (2000)
This paper discusses what the function of the aesthetic sense is for Hutcheson, and how its function bears on a number of exegetical issues viz. Whether there is any possibility of objectivity within the scope of the theory and what the status of his analogy between secondary qualities and beauty actually amounts to. I argue that the aesthetic sense is analogous to a prevalent account of bodily sensations, which saw bodily sensation as having the function jointly signalling and eliciting motivational dispositions toward features that are harmful or beneficial to the body. The aesthetic sense is supposed to motivate us toward gaining knowledge of the world, and allows for a standard of taste relative to its function. The paper is a complement to my 'Hutcheson's Moral Sense', History of Philosophy Quarterly (forthcoming 2001).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Patricia Sheridan (2007). The Metaphysical Morality of Francis Hutcheson: A Consideration of Hutcheson's Critique of Moral Fitness Theory. Sophia 46 (3):263-275.
Susan M. Purviance, Hutcheson's Aesthetic Realism and Moral Qualities. History of Intellectual Culture.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Functional Beauty, Architecture, and Morality: A Beautiful Konzentrationslager? Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):128-147.
James Shelley (2007). Aesthetics and the World at Large. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):169-183.
Aaron Szymkowiak (2007). Hutcheson's Painless Imagination and the Problem of Moral Beauty. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):349-368.
Gary Iseminger (2004). The Aesthetic Function of Art. Cornell University Press.
Nick Zangwill (2009). Reply to Larry Shiner on Architecture. Sztuka I Filozofia 35:254.
Jeroen de Ridder (2006). The (Alleged) Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations. Techne 10 (1):79-94.
Andrew Chignell (2007). Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #245,890 of 1,724,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,623 of 1,724,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?