Incidental Findings from Deep Phenotyping Research in Psychiatry: Legal and Ethical Considerations

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (4):482-486 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Substantial advancement in the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders may come from assembling diverse data streams from clinical notes, neuroimaging, genetics, and real-time digital footprints from smartphones and wearable devices. This is called “deep phenotyping” and often involves machine learning. We argue that incidental findings arising in deep phenotyping research have certain special, morally and legally salient features: They are specific, actionable, numerous, and probabilistic. We consider ethical and legal implications of these features and propose a practical ethics strategy for managing them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incidental Findings in Pediatric Research.Benjamin S. Wilfond & Katherine J. Carpenter - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):332-340.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian Van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):292-297.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian Van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):292-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
7 (#1,387,389)

6 months
5 (#639,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references