Regulating functional foods in the european union: Informed choice versus consumer protection? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):545-556 (2003)
Due to the rise of functional foods,the distinction between foods and medicines hasbecome increasingly blurred. A new EUregulation covering health claims and otherclaims on food and drink products is on thedocks. A basic motive of legal regulation oflabeling and advertising is to inform andprotect the consumer. Promotion of informedchoice and consumer protection may, however, beconflicting objectives. A further problemsprings from the fact that choice, likeconsent, is a propositional attitude andtherefore opaque. Thus it is extremelydifficult for regulators to fasten onparticular formulations of claims. Despite theprofessed respect for the autonomy of theconsumer, paternalism is never far away andeasily enters in various guises.
|Keywords||autonomy consumer health claims paternalism propositional attitude|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2008). Consumer Autonomy and Sufficiency of Gmf Labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):353-369.
David J. Garren (2007). Paternalism, Part II. Philosophical Books 48 (1):50-59.
Similar books and articles
Klaus Peter Rippe (2000). Novel Foods and Consumer Rights: Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):71-80.
Doris Schroeder (2007). Public Health, Ethics, and Functional Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):247-259.
David Kaplan (2007). What's Wrong with Functional Foods? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):177-187.
Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer (2005). Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):75-84.
Chris MacDonald & Melissa Whellams (2007). Corporate Decisions About Labelling Genetically Modified Foods. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):181 - 189.
Assya Pascalev (2003). You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Miltos Liakopoulos & Doris Schroeder (2003). Trust and Functional Foods. New Products, Old Issues. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):41-52.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2011). Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Volkert Beekman (2008). Consumer Rights to Informed Choice on the Food Market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):61 - 72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #336,406 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?