David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 5 (2):105-120 (2001)
There is a contemporary conflict between individualistic andcommunitarian conceptions of rationality. Robert Goodin describes it asa conflict between an enlightenment individualistic conception of a``sovereign artificer'''' and ``a socially unencumbered self'''' ascontrasted with the communitarian conception of a ``socially embeddedself'''' whose identity is formed by his or her community. Should wejustify and explain rationality individualistically or socially? This isa false dilemma when consensus is reached by a model articulated byKeith Lehrer and Carl Wagner. According to this model, the consensusresults from the positive weights individuals give to others and use tocontinually average and, thus, aggregate their allocations. Aggregationconverges toward a consensus in which the social preference and theindividual preferences become identical. The truth of communitarianismis to be found in the aggregate and the truth of individualism in theaggregation. The original conflict dissolves in rational consensus.
|Keywords||aggregation communitarianism connectedness consensus convergence Enlightenment individualism interpersonal unity liberalism Robert Gordin self weights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anita Konzelmann Ziv (2012). Institutional Virtue: How Consensus Matters. Philosophical Studies 161 (1):87-96.
Anita Konzelmann Ziv (2012). Institutional Virtue: How Consensus Matters. Philosophical Studies 161 (1):87 - 96.
Similar books and articles
Keith Lehrer (1975). Social Consensus and Rational Agnoiology. Synthese 31 (1):141-160.
Aviezer Tucker (2003). The Epistemic Significance of Consensus. Inquiry 46 (4):501 – 521.
Keith Lehrer (2001). The Rationality of Dissensus: A Reply to Goodin. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 5 (2):133-137.
Robert E. Goodin (2001). Consensus Interruptus. Journal of Ethics 5 (2):121-131.
Bruce Jennings (1991). Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Kyung-Man Kim (1996). Hierarchy of Scientific Consensus and the Flow of Dissensus Over Time. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (1):3-25.
K. J. Zollman (2012). Social Network Structure and the Achievement of Consensus. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):26-44.
Paul Hager (1998). Lifelong Education: From Conflict to Consensus? [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (4):323-332.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #40,449 of 1,099,789 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #126,844 of 1,099,789 )
How can I increase my downloads?