David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topoi 5 (2):187-196 (1986)
It is commonly supposed that Marx's Capital is part and parcel of his theory of historical materialism. It is argued here, however, that this view is incorrect, and that Capital is distinguished from the more general theory of historical materialism in its standing as a work of social science. This conclusion rests on several grounds. First, Capital is substantially more specialized than the theory of historical materialism, since it is concerned only with one aspect of one mode of production. As a result, Capital provides a more rigorous treatment of its subject matter. Second, Capital is based on a fund of empirical evidence which is substantially more detailed than that offered in support of the theses of historical materialism. And third, given the preceding points, Capital is a developed empirical theory, whereas historical materialism is best construed as a general program of research. For these reasons Capital is epistemically distinct from historical materialism: unlike the latter, it is a substantive contribution to social science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Colin Barker (2006). Capital and Revolutionary Practice. Historical Materialism 14 (2):55-82.
Kiyoshi Nagatani (2004). Capitalist Exploitation and the Law of Value. Science and Society 68 (1):57 - 79.
Massimiliano Tomba (2009). Historical Temporalities of Capital: An Anti-Historicist Perspective. Historical Materialism 17 (4):44-65.
Patrick Murray (2000). Marx's 'Truly Social' Labour Theory of Value: Part II, How Is Labour That Is Under the Sway of Capital Actually Abstract? Historical Materialism 7 (1):99-136.
Michael Neary & Graham Taylor (1998). Marx and the Magic of Money: Towards an Alchemy of Capital. Historical Materialism 2 (1):99-117.
Paul Mattick (2008). The Limits to Capital. Historical Materialism 16 (4):213-224.
Paul Burkett (2004). On Ben Fine's Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. Historical Materialism 12 (1):233-246.
Geoffrey Kay (1999). Abstract Labour and Capital. Historical Materialism 5 (1):255-280.
Pete Green (2004). On The Culmination of Capital: Essays on Volume III of Marx's 'Capital', Edited by Martha Campbell and Geert Reuten. Historical Materialism 12 (2):249-267.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #81,530 of 1,139,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,709 of 1,139,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?