David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 49 (3):290 – 311 (2006)
After more than a century of its development, philosophers working in the analytic tradition have recently begun to consider its history as an object of philosophical investigation.1 This development, particularly significant in the context of a tradition of inquiry that has often conceived of its own problems as ahistorical, is salutary in that it offers to show what, within the tradition, remains rich and vital for philosophy today, as well as to extract the significant theoretical and doctrinal results that can be considered to have been achieved in its itinerary so far. The appearance of a comprehensive, two-volume consideration of the history of analytic philosophy in the twentieth century, written by one of the tradition’s leading contemporary practitioners, is therefore cause for excitement. And Scott Soames’ two-volume Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century is, by any measure, an impressive work. Running to almost 900 pages, it assembles careful, meticulous and detailed expositions and analyses of the arguments and positions of a wide variety of thinkers within the analytic tradition, evaluating the extent of their insight and suggesting implications for philosophical thought today. The analysis is uniformly lucid and clearly written, offering the student of the analytic tradition an indispensable source of arguments she may want to consider in her own work, as well as, in its own argumentation, a suggestive model of at least one way of doing analytic philosophy. Over the course of his reconstructive and evaluative analysis, Soames considers the views and arguments of early analytic philosophers like Russell and Moore, logical positivists like Ayer and..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James Conant (2000). Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein. In Alice Crary & Rupert J. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge. 174--217.
James Conant (1998). Wittgenstein on Meaning and Use. Philosophical Investigations 21 (3):222–250.
Cora Diamond (2000). Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Alice Crary & Rupert J. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge. 150--13.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1993/1994). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alfred Nordmann (2005). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart Brown, Diane Collinson, Dr Robert Wilkinson & Robert Wilkinson (eds.) (1998). One Hundred Twentieth-Century Philosophers. Routledge.
Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Christopher Pincock, Comments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume I.
Robert Hanna (2008). Kant in the Twentieth Century. In Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. 150-203.
Juliet Floyd & Sanford Shieh (eds.) (2001). Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Paul Redding (2007). Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Scott Soames (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #55,912 of 1,096,849 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #17,513 of 1,096,849 )
How can I increase my downloads?