Roger Bacon on the Division of Statements into Single/Multiple and Simple/Composed

Review of Metaphysics 56 (2):297 - 321 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IT IS CERTAINLY THE CASE that twelfth- and thirteenth-century treatises on logic represent in great part attempts to represent the Organon, Aristotle’s books on logic, by rearranging the material, adding clarifications, and sometimes breaking new ground as in the case of the treatise on the property of terms. Thus when Roger Bacon is writing his Summulae dialectices around 1252, he is confronted by the problem of what to do with the material on the classification of statements into single or multiple, and simple or composed in chapter 5 of Aristotle’s On Interpretation. There, apropos of the two divisions and interspersed among other claims, we read the following

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Roger Bacon on equivocation.Thomas S. Maloney - 1984 - Vivarium 22 (2):85-112.
The Extreme Realism of Roger Bacon.Thomas S. Maloney - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (4):807 - 837.
Two types of multiple-conclusion systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
Compendium of the study of theology.Roger Bacon - 1988 - New York: E.J. Brill. Edited by Thomas S. Maloney.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
22 (#705,136)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Roger Bacon.Jeremiah Hackett - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references