The function of moral norms in the legal system: The Krausists’s restoration of the fundamental concepts of law

Human Affairs 21 (1):70-85 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are multiple and diverse voices of jurists who have expressed their fear of the unrestricted power of law enforcement and have announced the crisis of the formalist sense of Law. The widespread reaction against the abstract and formalist character of the positivist theory of law manifested itself as the Krausist philosophy of law and was backed by the philosophy of Krause, Schelling, Hegel and the most recent Natural Law theories that seek to establish substantial criteria for moral action. This distrust was caused by the heteronomy of modest and obedient civil servants of the judicial order that rely on political balance of power in which nothing depends on the human bottom of institutions. Let us consider briefly the impressive analyses performed by different thinkers on this issue, which they considered characteristic of their era, but that continues to constitute a difficulty that challenges contemporary society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Legal Concepts Embedded in Legal Norms?Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki & Mateusz Klinowski - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):553-562.
The Social Rule Theory of Law.Brian McCalla Miller - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Justice in the Garden of Eden.Roger A. Shiner - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (245):301-316.
Genealogy of morality and law.José Antonio Marina - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):303-325.
Game Theory and Moral Norms: An Overview and an Application.Bruno Verbeek - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
The creation of normative facts.Carsten Heidemann - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):263-281.
Law and morality in contemporary philosophy of law.Dejan Vuk Stanković - 2002 - Filozofija I Društvo 2002 (19):203-212.
The Interpretative Nature of Constitution.Gediminas Mesonis - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 118 (4):47-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references