From Marx to Freud to Marx

Radical Philosophy Review 16 (1):25-30 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sidney Lipshires, a Marxist scholar, considered Marcuse’s shift “from Marx to Freud” problematic. Marcuse’s legitimate criticism of the conformist/adjustment elements of psychoanalytical practice seemed to Lipshires to require a recognition of theoretical weakness in Freud’s philosophical metapsychology, but this is in fact what Marcuse admires most—as explained in Eros and Civilization. Marcuse responds that Freud’s mythological material serves to recall the possibility of a nonrepressive culture! The anthropological research of Margaret Mead operates likewise. Marcuse steadfastly regards practice as political praxis, aiming at changing society as a whole, and says that Mead’s work and Freud’s work has helped him bring social theory back to Marx.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Herbert Marcuse: from Marx to Freud and beyond.Sidney Lipshires - 1974 - Cambridge, Mass.,: Schenkman Pub. Co.; [distributed by General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J..
Herbert Marcuse.Jürgen Habermas & Charles Reitz - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (1):17-19.
Herbert Marcuse.Jürgen Habermas & Charles Reitz - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (1):17-19.
Marcuse’s Understanding of Freud.Roddy F. Gerraughty - 1979 - Philosophy Research Archives 5:242-258.
Eros and Civilization revisited.Peter M. R. Stirk - 1999 - History of the Human Sciences 12 (1):73-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
50 (#318,455)

6 months
6 (#522,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references