Philosophy of Science 26 (3):260-269 (1959)
|Abstract||A new semantical antinomy, the antinomy of designation, is introduced into a metalanguage M with respect to a modal object language L. Carnap's device of restricting the principle of interchangeability for L does not suffice to prevent occurrence of this new antinomy. To achieve this result it seems most natural to replace the rules of designation for L by more complicated rules. This replacement suffices to prevent occurrence of the antinomy with respect to L. Moreover, it seems likely that analogous replacement will suffice to prevent occurrence of the antinomy with respect to languages which in means of expression are richer than L|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Avery Goldman (2010). An Antinomy of Political Judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the Role of Purposiveness in Reflective Judgment. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
Aleksandar Kellenberg (2010). The Antinomy of the Variable. Dialectica 64 (2):225-236.
Peter McLaughlin (1990). Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. E. Mellen Press.
Bernhard Milz (2002). Der Gesuchte Widerstreit: Die Antinomie in Kants Kritik Der Praktischen Vernunft. W. De Gruyter.
Sean Greenberg (2005). From Canon to Dialectic to Antinomy: Giving Inclinations Their Due. Inquiry 48 (3):232 – 248.
Benjamin Schnieder (2010). Inexpressible Properties and Grelling's Antinomy. Philosophical Studies 148 (3).
Robert S. Taylor (2009). Children as Projects and Persons: A Liberal Antinomy. Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):555-576.
Michael C. Rhodes (2005). Logical Proof of Antinomy: A Trinitarian Interpretation of the Law of Identity. Theandros 2 (3).
Timothy Bays (2001). On Putnam and His Models. Journal of Philosophy 98 (7):331-350.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?