Artificial Intelligence and the Metamorphosis of Beauty: A Philosophical Inquiry

Open Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):180-200 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) to be appraised as an object of beauty is critically examined through the lens of philosophical thought. Tracing beauty’s evolution from Platonic ideals to contemporary interpretations, the analysis contends that AI’s emergence offers a unique illustration of beauty in the modern age. Confronting the challenge of assigning beauty to entities devoid of consciousness or emotional depth, the argument unfolds to suggest that the intricate design of AI’s algorithms and its technological advancements constitute an emergent form of beauty, one inherently tied to human intellectual endeavor. The article proposes that with time, as with historical art forms, the aesthetic qualities of AI may gain broader acknowledgment, implying that technological advancements necessitate an ongoing revision of established beauty norms. The historical evolution of beauty has been traced in details, and an extended literature review has been provided, serving as the foundation for a comprehensive exploration into the potential for AI to be recognized as an object of beauty. The harmony, elegance, and problem-solving capabilities of AI algorithms have been meticulously evaluated, with a comparison made to classical elements of beauty in an effort to contextually situate AI within longstanding aesthetic traditions. Furthermore, the analysis has been extended to consider the emergence of artificial and digital beauty, alongside an investigation into the parallels drawn between divine and artificial intelligence. As part of a deeper inquiry, the possibility of human emotions, such as awe and love, being authentically directed towards AI has been scrutinized. In conclusion, a reflection has been presented on the transformative role of AI in reimagining the conceptual landscape of beauty, prompting readers to thoughtfully engage with an extended review and the philosophical and cultural implications emerging from AI’s evolving influence on the field of aesthetics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embodied artificial intelligence once again.Anna Sarosiek - 2017 - Philosophical Problems in Science 63:231-240.
Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein.Gerard Casey - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:156-175.
Ai: Its Nature and Future.Margaret A. Boden - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise.Paul Dumouchel - 2019 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 24 (2):241-258.
10 On the Subjective, Beauty and Artificial Intelligence: A Kantian Approach.Larissa Berger - 2022 - In Hyeongjoo Kim & Dieter Schönecker (eds.), Kant and Artificial Intelligence. De Gruyter. pp. 255-282.
Ethical Machines?Ariela Tubert - 2018 - Seattle University Law Review 41 (4).
Consciousness, intentionality, and intelligence: Some foundational issues for artificial intelligence.Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-02

Downloads
7 (#1,382,898)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Metaphysics of Beauty.Nick Zangwill - 2001 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
On Beauty and Being Just.Elaine Scarry - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
Undoing aesthetics.Wolfgang Welsch - 1997 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Undoing Aesthetics.Richard Shusterman - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (1):83-84.
Appreciating "Traditional" Aboriginal Painting Aesthetically.Elizabeth Burns Coleman - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):235-247.

Add more references