Quid juris and Judicial Imputation

In Camilla Serck-Hanssen & Beatrix Himmelmann (eds.), The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. De Gruyter. pp. 1835-1844 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110701357-183

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Quid juris and judicial imputation.Sofie Møller - 2021 - In Camilla Serck-Hanssen and Beatrix Himmelmann (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress: The Court of Reason (Oslo, 6–9 August 2019). De Gruyter. pp. 1835-1844.
3. The Quid Juris.Dennis Schulting - 2018 - In Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. De Gruyter. pp. 28-62.
Quid facti or quid Juris? The fundamental ambiguity of Gadamer's understanding of hermeneutics.Lawrence M. Hinman - 1980 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (4):512-535.
La teoría de los diferenciales de Salomon Maimon, la pregunta quid juris y la posibilidad de la metafísica como ciencia.Hernán Pringe - 2016 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 33 (1):81-102.
On the Normative Aspect of Concepts As Rules.Predrag Cicovacki - 1995 - Idealistic Studies 25 (1):25-49.
Genealogy and Jurisprudence in Fichte’s Genetic Deduction of the Categories.G. Anthony Bruno - 2018 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 35 (1):77-96.
Quid juris? Quid facti?: D’une nouvelle tentative de relever une opposition capitale: Jean-Renaud Seba, Le partage de l’empirique et du transcendantal. Essai sur la normativité de la raison: Kant, Hegel, Husserl. Bruxelles, Éditions Ousia, 2006, 440 pp., 24 Euros, ISBN 978-2-87060-126-6. [REVIEW]Björn Thorsteinsson - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):253-258.
Hans Kelsen's Doctrine of Imputation.Stanley L. Paulson - 2001 - Ratio Juris 14 (1):47-63.
L’horizon transcendantal du droit selon Kant.Simon Goyard-Fabre - 2015 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1:77-96.
In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place.Ming-Sung Kuo - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (1):83-104.
Hans Kelsen's Concept of Normative Imputation.Peter Langford & Ian Bryan - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):85-110.
Hans Kelsen's Concept of Normative Imputation.Ian Bryan Peter Langford - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):85-110.
Overcoming Judicial Supremacy through Constitutional Amendment: Some Critical Reflections.Mariano C. Melero De La Torre - 2021 - Ratio Juris 34 (2):161-179.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
11 (#1,120,716)

6 months
10 (#256,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sofie Møller
University of Cologne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references