Undoing legal violence: Walter Benjamin's and Giorgio Agamben's aesthetics of pure means

Abstract

Giorgio Agamben calls for a playful relation to law as a way to counteract its inherent violence. Such a relation would prevent law from functioning as a means to an end, instead treating it as a pure means. This article evaluates the significance of Agamben's proposal and of the concept of pure means, arguing that both implicitly draw on a Kantian model of aesthetic experience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The open: man and animal.Giorgio Agamben - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Potentialities: collected essays in philosophy.Giorgio Agamben - 1999 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Daniel Heller-Roazen.
Community and resistance in Heidegger, Nancy and Agamben.Brian Elliott - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):259-271.
Why Giorgio Agamben is an optimist.Sergei Prozorov - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1053-1073.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#256,426)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Morgan
West Chester University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references