Our Knowledge of the Growth of Knowledge: Popper or Wittgenstein?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Routledge & K. Paul (1985)
Peter Munz, a former student of both Popper and Wittgenstein, begins his comparison of the two great twentieth-century philosophers, by explaining that since the demise of positivism there have emerged, broadly speaking, two philosophical options: Wittgenstein, with the absolute relativism of his theory that meaning is a function of language games and that social configurations are determinants of knowledge; and Popper’s evolutionary epistemology – conscious knowledge is a special case of the relationship which exists between all living beings and their environments. Professor Munz examines and rejects the Wittgensteinian position. Instead, Our Knowledge of the Growth of Knowledge , first published in 1985, elaborates the potentially fruitful link between Popper’s critical rationalism and Neo-Darwinism. Read in the light of the latter, Popper’s philosophy leads to the transformation of Kant’s Transcendental Idealism into ‘Hypothetical Realism’, whilst the emphasis on the biological orientation of Popper’s thought helps to illumine some difficulties in Popper’s ‘falsificationism’
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$0.82 used $48.06 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD161.M86 1985|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Vasso P. Kindi (1995). Kuhn'sthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):75 - 92.
Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap (2000). Methodology Now! Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1):95-108.
Similar books and articles
Scott Scheall (2011). Later Wittgenstein and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):268-286.
Stephen Hetherington (2001). Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Barry Barnes (1977). Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. Routledge and K. Paul.
Stephanie Chitpin (2013). Should Popper's View of Rationality Be Used for Promoting Teacher Knowledge? Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (8):833-844.
Karl R. Popper (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press.
Karl R. Popper (1989/2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.
H. T. Wilson (1988). Book Reviews : Our Knowledge of the Growth of Knowledge: Popper or Wittgenstein? By Peter Munz. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985. Toronto: Methuen. Pp. Xii + 353. $46.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (4):577-580.
Anthony O'Hear (1988). The Evolution of Knowledge. Critical Review 2 (1):78-91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #611,756 of 1,792,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,728 of 1,792,900 )
How can I increase my downloads?