Copernican Revolution: Unification of Mundane Physics with Mathematics of the Skies

Logos: Innovative Technologies Publishing House (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What were the reasons of the Copernican Revolution ? How did modern science (created by a bunch of ambitious intellectuals) manage to force out the old one created by Aristotle and Ptolemy, rooted in millennial traditions and strongly supported by the Church? What deep internal causes and strong social movements took part in the genesis, development and victory of modern science? The author comes to a new picture of Copernican Revolution on the basis of the elaborated model of scientific revolutions that takes into account some recent advances in philosophy, sociology and history of science. The model was initially invented to describe Einstein’s Revolution of the XX century beginning. The model considers the growth of knowledge as interaction, interpenetration and unification of the research programmes, springing out of different cultural traditions. Thus, Copernican Revolution appears as a result of revealation and (partial) resolution of the dualism , of the gap between Ptolemy’s mathematical astronomy and Aristotelian qualitative physics. The works of Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler and Newton were all the stages of mathematics descendance from skies to earth and reciprocal extrapolation of earth physics on skies. The model elaborated enables to reassess the role of some social factors crucial for the scientific revolution. It is argued that initially modern science was a result of the development of Christian Weltanschaugung . Later the main support came from the absolute monarchies. In the long run the creators of modern science appeared to be the “apparatchics” of the “regime of truth” built-in state machine. Natural science became a part of ideological state apparatus providing not only scientific education but the internalization of values crucial for the functioning of state.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rise of Modern Science: When and Why?R. Hooykaas - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):453-473.
Reflections on the Scientific Revolution (1543–1687).Owen Gingerich - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 603--617.
Platonism and the Rise of Science.Meyrick H. Carré - 1955 - Philosophy 30 (115):333 - 343.
The tower experiment and the copernican revolution.Gunnar Andersson - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-28

Downloads
215 (#93,468)

6 months
54 (#84,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rinat M. Nugayev
Moscow State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references