David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 39 (3):280–297 (1998)
This article seeks to place the theodicy of the Anglican theologian Austin Farrer, as expressed in Love Almighty and Ills Unlimited , within the context of philosophical and theological approaches to the so‐called “problem of evil”. Farrer's work is initially contrasted with the theodicies of John Hick and Richard Swinburne. This comparison reveals some of the rationalist and foundationalist moral assumptions of modern philosophical theodicy of which Hick and Swinburne are representatives. By contrast, it is argued that Farrer's approach is thoroughly theological and begins not with a pre‐conceived ethics, but with God's self‐revelation in Jesus Christ. Farrer is thus deemed to have much in common with pre‐Enlightenment thinkers such as Augustine and Aquinas.Although Farrer's theodicy is seen to be theological , it is argued that he resists trends in recent theological approaches to theodicy that claim that God is passible . This article defends divine impassibility and argues that, although Farrer's later “metaphysical personalism” implies that God may be personal to the point that he could be said to suffer, his Augustinian notion of the nature of evil as privatio boni strongly implies impassibility. This Farrer is seen to avoid two anthropomorphic approaches to theodicy: one that judges God by the standards of a foundational secular morality, and the other that ascribes certain “personal” emotions to the divine.This article defends Farrer's theological approach to theodicy and his emphasis on ecclesiology and soteriology. However, the lack of a convincing and thorough dogmatic theology is seen to render his theodicy uncompelling. Despite this weakness, it is argued that Farrer's work points theodicy towards a theological encounter with particular narratives of evil and suffering and away from the consideration of a single “problem of evil” by means of “rational”, philosophical enquiry
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Austin Marsden[from old catalog] Farrer (1967). Faith and Speculation. New York University Press.
R. MacSwain (2005). Book Review: Captured by the Crucified: The Practical Theology of Austin Farrer. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (3):154-157.
Robert MacSwain (2010). Centenary Perspectives on Austin Farrer: A Review Article. Philosophy Compass 5 (9):820-829.
Austin Farrer (1963). Our Experience of God. H. D. Lewis. (Allen and Unwin. 1959.). Philosophy 38 (145):281-.
Charles Conti (1989). The Personalism of Austin Farrer. The Personalist Forum 5 (2):83-118.
Austin Marsden Farrer (1972/1974). Reflective Faith. Grand Rapids,Eerdmans.
Austin Farrer & W. D. Falk (1989). Humanism. The Personalist Forum 5 (2):69-81.
Austin Marsden Farrer (1960). The Freedom of the Will. New York, Scribner.
Charles C. Conti (1995). Metaphysical Personalism: An Analysis of Austin Farrer's Metaphysics of Theism. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #304,000 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?