David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 12 (2):212-237 (2004)
: In the concluding pages of his Epistolae duae de motu impresso a motore translato (1642), Pierre Gassendi provides a brief summary of the explanation of the tides found in Galileo's Dialogue over the Two Chief World Systems (1632). A comparison between the two texts reveals, however, that Gassendi surreptitiously modifies Galileo's theory in some crucial points in the vain hope of rendering it more compatible with the observed phenomena. But why did Gassendi not acknowledge his departures from the Galilean model? The present article argues that cautiousness was just one of the reasons that stopped the French priest from turning Galileo's theory into his own theory. He was probably also aware of the fact that Kepler's model of planetary motion, which he endorsed in the Epistolae, could not be reconciled with Galileo's explanation of the tides. In the postumously published Syntagma philosophicum (1658), Gassendi tried to mend this major inconsistency by arguing that Galileo's theory of the tides not only remained valid, but became even more coherent, if one attributed to the Earth an elliptic orbit. But given that in the Syntagma Gassendi officially adhered to the Tychonic system, his effort to reconcile Kepler and Galileo, while already unconvincing by itself, appears completely futile
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Carla Rita Palmerino (2010). Experiments, Mathematics, Physical Causes: How Mersenne Came to Doubt the Validity of Galileo's Law of Free Fall. Perspectives on Science 18 (1):pp. 50-76.
Antoni Malet & Daniele Cozzoli (2010). Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics. Perspectives on Science 18 (1):1-8.
Similar books and articles
Douglas Michael Jesseph (2004). Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Antonia LoLordo (2007). Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
William Forgie (2007). Gassendi and Kant on Existence. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):511 - 523.
Antonia LoLordo (2008). Epicurean and Galilean Motion in Gassendi's Physics. Philosophy Compass 3 (2):301–314.
Joseph C. Pitt (1986). The Character of Galilean Evidence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:125 - 134.
Lisa T. Sarasohn (1996). Gassendi's Ethics: Freedom in a Mechanistic Universe. Cornell University Press.
Pierre Gassendi (1981). Pierre Gassendi's Institutio Logica (1658): A Critical Edition with Translation and Introduction. Van Gorcum.
Antonia LoLordo (2005). Gassendi on Human Knowledge of the Mind. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (1):1-21.
Pierre Gassendi (1972). The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. New York,Johnson Reprint Corp..
Joseph C. Pitt (1988). Galileo, Rationality and Explanation. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #97,435 of 1,096,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #35,870 of 1,096,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?