Did Morality First Evolve in Homo erectus?

Philosophical Problems in Science 61:105-131 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With findings from cognitive science, neuroscience, information science, and paleoanthropology, an anthropologist and astronomer-priest team take a new look at the nature of morality, and suggest parameters that are often very different from the philosophical and theological literatures. They see morality as a biologically-based arbitration mechanism that works along a timeline with a valence of good to bad. It is rational, purposeful, social, and affected by emotion but not dominated by it. The authors examine the age and sex structure, family roles, environment, cognition, and lifeway of Homo erectus, an early hominin who arose 1.9 million years ago, and propose that he had a rudimentary moral system that his biology and culture enabled – but only after he learned to control fire. Hearths gave rise to an intense, social, emotional, experiential context where belief systems could be learned by youth before they achieved adult cognition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was homo erectus an ecological dominant species?P. Slurink - 1995 - In John R. F. Bower & S. Sartono (eds.), Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus. Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation. pp. 169-176.
Archaeology and cognitive evolution.Thomas Wynn - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):389-402.
Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus.John R. F. Bower & S. Sartono (eds.) - 1995 - Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation.
The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):169-177.
Recritude: Reflections on Postural Ontology.Adriana Cavarero - 2013 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27 (3):220-235.
The devil in the details.Thomas Wynn - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):426-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-25

Downloads
25 (#633,346)

6 months
7 (#430,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references