David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):380-390 (2013)
This paper suggests the democratic direction in which the right of freedom of expression should be conceived and applied. In the first two sections it suggests some counter-examples to, and diagnoses of, the libertarian and liberal conceptions of freedom of expression, taking Scanlon (1972) and Scanlon (1979), respectively, to be their chief proponents. The paper suggests that these conceptions cannot take into account clear examples, like fraudulent propaganda, which should not be legal. The democratic conception takes it to heart that the pillars upon which the right of freedom of expression is founded are individual and collective autonomy, the right to know facts of public interest and information necessary for effective democratic control of government. The paper suggests that in a time when private powers seriously threaten these pillars, it is correct for the government to step in to provide the framework in which genuine discussion geared toward fulfilling the objectives of these pillars can take place.
|Keywords||democracy freedom of expression social choice information|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Pettit (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Gerald Dworkin, Paternalism. The Monist.
Kenneth J. Arrow (1952). Social Choice and Individual Values. Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.
C. A. J. Coady (2008). Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Re'em Segev (2008). Freedom of Expression: Justifications & Restrictions. Israel Democracy Institute.
Kenton F. Machina (1984). Freedom of Expression in Commerce. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Corey Brettschneider (2010). When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? The Dilemmas of Freedom of Expression and Democratic Persuasion. Perspectives on Politics 8 (4):1005-1019.
Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.) (2009). Freedom of Speech Abridged?: Cultural, Legal and Philosophical Challenges. Nordicom.
Adam Bellow (ed.) (2010). New Threats to Freedom. Templeton Press.
Michael P. Allen (2006). Hegel Between Non-Domination and Expressive Freedom: Capabilities, Perspectives, Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):493-512.
Jonathan Gilmore (2011). Expression as Realization: Speakers' Interests in Freedom of Speech. Law and Philosophy 30 (5):517-539.
Mark C. Vopat (2010). Mandatory School Uniforms and Freedom of Expression. Ethics and Education 5 (3):203 - 215.
Danny Frederick (2011). Pornography and Freedom. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):84-95.
Bruce Barry (2007). The Cringing and The Craven. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2):263-296.
Stephen Houlgate (1997). Hegel and the "End" of Art. The Owl of Minerva 29 (1):1-21.
Lawrence B. Solum (1989). Freedom of Communicative Action. Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Mary T. Clark (ed.) (1973). The Problem of Freedom. New York,Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Added to index2012-10-03
Total downloads164 ( #20,153 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #50,580 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?