David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Berkeley Studies 20:22-33 (2009)
Marc A. Hight has given us a well-researched, well-written, analytically rigorous and thoughtprovoking book about the development of idea ontology in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. The book covers a great deal of material, some in significant depth, some not. The figures discussed include Descartes, Malebranche, Arnauld, Locke, Leibniz, Berkeley, and Hume. Some might think it a tall order for anyone to grapple with the central works of these figures on a subject as fundamental as the nature of ideas. And while reading the book, I must admit to having had this thought a few times. Seventeen pages on Descartes’ theory of ideas, covering the development of his ontology of ideas, the distinction between formal reality and objective reality, the nature of mental representation, the contagion theory of causation, the doctrine of innate ideas as ungrounded dispositions, and the interactionism/occasionalism controversy? Wow. And yet Hight has done his homework. He knows the figures and the relevant interpretive controversies well, he focuses on many of the passages that are relevant to the book’s central thesis, and in the end offers us a compelling narrative as an alternative to what he identifies as “the traditional view of what transpired in the early modern period” (2).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Monte Cook (2009). Review of Marc A. Hight, Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (1).
Marc A. Hight (2001). Locke's Implicit Ontology of Ideas. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):17 – 42.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (2001). Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 Volumes. Oxford University Press (Hardcover).
Ericka Tucker (2011). Idea and Ontology. An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):123-124.
Marc A. Hight (2005). Defending Berkeley's Divine Ideas. Philosophia 33 (1-4):97-128.
John W. Yolton (2000). Realism and Appearances: An Essay in Ontology. Cambridge University Press.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Saul Traiger, IDEAS. Locke Used the Term "to Stand for Whatsoever is the Object of the Understanding When a Man Thinks.".
Added to index2010-04-20
Total downloads26 ( #66,206 of 1,100,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #176,272 of 1,100,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?