Proclus as Heresiarch: Theological Polemic and Philosophical Commentary in Nicholas of Methone’s Refutation of Proclus’ Elements of Theology

In Sergei Mariev (ed.), Byzantine Perspectives on Neoplatonism. De Gruyter. pp. 103-136 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proclus' Commentary on the Pythagorean Golden Verses.Abu Al-Faraj Abd Allah Ibn Al-Tayyib & Neil Linley - 1983 - Dept. Of Classics, State University of N.Y. At Buffalo.
Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus.Danielle A. Layne - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362.
Proclus and the neoplatonic syllogistic.John N. Martin - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):187-240.
Proclus : Filosofie en mythologie.Carlos Steel - 1986 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 48 (2):191 - 206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-11

Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references