A woman's "right to know"?: Forced ultrasound measures as an intervention of biopower

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (1):51-73 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Starting in late 2011, public discourse increased around several similar pieces of proposed and enacted legislation that began to appear in the United States. These instruments, currently at different stages in their respective legislatures, impose or intend to impose restrictions on the conditions under which an abortion can be provided to a woman seeking to terminate her pregnancy.1 Among this set of instruments is state-level legislation, modeled after the Woman’s Ultrasound Right to Know Act, a law and policy guide developed by the pro-life/anti-choice group, Americans United for Life (AUL). This guide and the legislation that is modeled on it state that a woman seeking an abortion cannot give “informed ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mandatory Ultrasound Laws and the Coercive Use of Informed Consent.Cynthia D. Coe & Matthew C. Altman - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):16-30.
Reproductive autonomy and the ethics of abortion.Barbara Hewson - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):10-14.
On an inconsistency in Thomson's abortion argument.Roger F. Gibson - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (1):131 - 139.
Issues for service providers: a response to points raised.Ann Furedi - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):28-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-09

Downloads
24 (#653,725)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references