The game-theoretic innocence of experimental behavioral psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hertwig and Ortmann imply that failure of many behavioral psychologists to observe several central methodological principles of experimental economics derives mainly from differences in disciplinary culture. I suggest that there are deeper philosophical causes, based (ironically) on a legacy of methodological individualism in psychology from which economists have substantially cured themselves through use of game theory. Psychologists often misidentify their objects of study by trying to wrench subjects out of their normal behavioral contexts in games.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

We should not impose narrow restrictions on psychological methods.Michael Maratsos - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):422-423.
Towards the unity of the human behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57.
A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Distinctive human social motivations in a game-theoretic framework.Don Ross - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):715-716.
Other scientific purposes, other methodological ways.Marie-Paule Lecoutre & Bruno Lecoutre - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):421-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#442,490)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Don Ross
University College, Cork

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references