Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):311-318 (1999)
|Abstract||This paper comments on the conflict between ethical relativism and anthropologists’ concerns with rights, and tries to show that neither scientific objectivity nor respect for cultural diversity require denying an extracultural stance for ethical judgments.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Derek Lovejoy (1999). Objectivity, Causality and Ideology in Modern Physics. Science and Society 63 (4):433 - 458.
Carol S. Robb (1998). Liberties, Claims, Entitlements, and Trumps: Reproductive Rights and Ecological Responsibilities. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):283 - 294.
Joseph F. Hanna (2004). The Scope and Limits of Scientific Objectivity. Philosophy of Science 71 (3):339-361.
James Turner Johnson (1998). Human Rights and Violence in Contemporary Context. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):319 - 328.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the Mit Press.
John Mahoney (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance. Blackwell Pub..
H. E. Longino (1983). Scientific Objectivity and the Logics of Science. Inquiry 26 (1):85 – 106.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?