?Person? As essentially contested concept in the commonwealth of discourse

Metaphilosophy 23 (4):363-377 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2007

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9973.1992.tb00549.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rape as an essentially contested concept.Eric Reitan - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (2):43-66.
Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused? [REVIEW]Samantha Miles - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):285-298.
Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Art as an essentially contested concept.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Philosophical Quarterly 6 (23):97-114.
Medicine as an essentially contested concept.C. McKnight - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):261-262.
Is the concept of the person necessary for human rights?Jens David Ohlin - unknown
Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in florida)?Jeremy Waldron - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (2):137-164.
On explaining political disagreement: The notion of an essentially contested concept.Andrew Mason - 1990 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):81 – 98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
18 (#830,660)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references