Selecting decision strategies: The differential role of affect

Cognition and Emotion 29 (1):158-167 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many theories on cognition assume that people adapt their decision strategies depending on the situation they face. To test if and how affect guides the selection of decision strategies, we conducted an online study (N = 166), where different mood states were induced through video clips. Results indicate that mood influenced the use of decision strategies. Negative mood, in particular anger, facilitated the use of non-compensatory strategies, whereas positive mood promoted compensatory decision rules. These results are in line with the idea that positive mood broadens the focus of attention and thus increases the use of compensatory decision strategies that take many pieces of information into account, whereas negative mood narrows the focus of attention and thus fosters non-compensatory strategies that rely on a selective use of information. The results further indicate that gaining a deeper theoretical understanding of the cognitive mechanisms that govern decision processes requires taking emotions into account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethical and political evaluation of biotechnology strategies.Juha Räikkä - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):273-280.
Competing Responsibly.Ronald Jeurissen - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):299-317.
Role of nonreward in differential conditioning.Earl R. McHewitt & James H. McHose - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):531.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-07

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?