To appear in natural language semantics
| Abstract | This paper strives to characterize the relation between accent placement and discourse in terms of independent constraints operating at the interface between syntax and interpretation. The GIVENness Constraint requires un-F-marked constituents to be GIVEN. Key here is our definition of GIVENness which synthesizes insights from the literature on the semantics of focus with older views on information structure. AvoidF requires speakers to economize on F-marking. A third constraint requires a subset of F-markers to dominate accents. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Henry Jackman (2003). Expression, Thought, and Language. Philosophia 31 (1-2):33-54.
Reinhard Muskens (1991). [Book Chapter]. Springer Netherlands.
Peter Pagin (forthcoming). Communication and the Complexity of Semantics. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery & Werning (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Compositionality.
Patrick Blackburn (2005). Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Chris Fox (2005). Foundations of Intensional Semantics. Blackwell Pub..
Alistair Knott (2003). Do Sensorimotor Processes Have Reflexes in Sentence Syntax as Well as Sentence Semantics? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):294-295.
William J. Rapaport (1988). Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural Language Understanding. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. Kluwer.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

