Triaging ethical issues in the coronavirus pandemic: how to prioritize bioethics research during public health emergencies

Bioethics 35 (4):380-384 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of the ethical discourse concerning the coronavirus pandemic has focused on the allocation of scarce resources, be it potentially beneficial new treatments, ventilators, intensive care beds, or oxygen. Somewhat ironically, the more important ethical issues may lie elsewhere, just as the more important medical issues do not concern intensive care or treatment for COVID‐19 patients, but rather the diversion towards these modes of care at the expense of non‐Covid patients and treatment. In this article I explore how ethicists can and should prioritize which ethical issues to deal with, and develop a method of triage for identification and prioritization of ethical issues both in the next public health emergency and in bioethics more widely.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The COVID-19 pandemic and social inequality.Christopher Ryan Maboloc & Carmelle Ayra Ferrer - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (5):234-237.
Ethics and public health emergencies: Rationing vaccines.Matthew K. Wynia - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):4 – 7.
Ethics and infectious disease.Michael J. Selgelid - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):272–289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-11

Downloads
15 (#974,361)

6 months
6 (#588,321)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David M. Shaw
University of Basel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references