Nanotechnology : assessment and convergence inside the technoscience

In Ewa Bińczyk & Tomasz Stepien (eds.), Modeling technoscience and nanotechnology assessment: perspectives and dilemmas. Wien: Peter Lang (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Caring about the future of the collective : monitoring technoscience in the sociology of risk and science and technology studies.Ewa Bińczyk & Tomasz Stepien - 2014 - In Ewa Bińczyk & Tomasz Stepien (eds.), Modeling technoscience and nanotechnology assessment: perspectives and dilemmas. Wien: Peter Lang.
Modeling technoscience and nanotechnology assessment: perspectives and dilemmas.Ewa Bińczyk & Tomasz Stepien (eds.) - 2014 - Wien: Peter Lang.
Do we need a specific kind of technoscience assessment? Taking the convergence of science and technology seriously.Karen Kastenhofer - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54.
Explorative Nanophilosophy as Tecnoscienza: An Italian Perspective on the Role of Speculation in Nanoindustry.Steven Umbrello - 2019 - TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies 10 (1):71-88.
Making worlds: epistemological, ontological and political dimensions of technoscience. [REVIEW]Jutta Weber - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):17-36.
Heuristics of technosciences: philosophical framing in the case of nanotechnology.Tomasz Stepien - 2016 - New York: Peter Lang.
Design and Aesthetics in Nanotechnology.Sacha Loeve - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 361-384.
A History of Technoscience: Erasing the Boundaries Between Science and Technology.David F. Channell - 2017 - Routledge.
Steps to Designing AI-Empowered Nanotechnology: A Value Sensitive Design Approach.Steven Umbrello - 2019 - Delphi - Interdisciplinary Review of Emerging Technologies 2 (2):79-83.
The philosophical impact of technoscience or the development of a pragmatic philosophy of science.Ramón Queraltó - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
A forensics of wishing: technology assessment in the age of technoscience. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):5-15.
Organising collective responsibility: On Precaution, Codes of Conduct and Understanding Public Debate. von Schomberg - 2010 - In U. Fiedeler (ed.), Understanding Nanotechnology. pp. 61-70.
From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The best way to predict the future is to create it”.Joachim Schummer - unknown
Technoscience – Science Without Scientists?Taras A. Varkhotov - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):32-37.
Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed. [REVIEW]Arie Rip & Harro van Lente - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):7-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references