The political philosophy of Miki Kiyoshi: A close reading of the philosophical foundations of cooperative communitarianism

Abstract

The thesis is a historical and philological study of the mature political theory of Miki Kiyoshi focused on Philosophical Foundations of Cooperative Communitarianism, a full translation of which is included. As the name suggests, it was a methodological and normative communitarianism, which critically built on liberalism, Marxism and Confucianism to realise a regional political community. Some of Miki’s Western readers have wrongly considered him a fascist ideologue, while he has been considered a humanist Marxist in Japan. A closer reading cannot support either view. The thesis argues that the Anglophone study of Japanese philosophy is a degenerating research programme ripe for revolution in the sense of returning full circle to an original point. That means returning to the texts, reading them contextually and philologically, in principle as early modern European political theory is read by intellectual historians, such as the representatives of Cambridge School history of political thought. The resulting reading builds critically on the Japanese scholarship and relates it to contemporary Western and postcolonial political theory and the East Asian tradition, particularly neo-Confucianism. The thesis argues for a Cambridge School perspective radicalised by the critical addendum of geo-cultural context, supplemented by Geertzian intercultural hermeneutics and a Saidian ‘return to philology’. As against those who have seen radical reorientations in Miki’s political thought, the thesis finds gradual progression and continuity between his neo-Kantian, existentialist, Marxian anthropology, Hegelian and finally communitarian phases. The theoretical underpinnings are his philosophical anthropology, a structurationist social theory of praxis, and a critique of liberalism, Marxism, nationalism and idealism emphasising concrete as opposed to abstract theory and the need to build on existing cultural traditions to modernise rather than westernise East Asia. This post-Western fusion was imagined to be the beginning of a true and pluralistic universalism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On confucian communitarianism.Weixi Hu - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):475-487.
Miki Kiyoshi zenshū.Kiyoshi Miki - 1966 - Iwanami Shoten. Edited by Hyōe Ōuchi.
Liberalism, Contractarianism, and the Problem of Exclusion.Philip Cook - 2015 - In Steven Wall (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 87-111.
Communitarianism: the practice of postmodern liberalism.Bob Brecher - 2006 - In Van der Pijl K.-G. Giesen & K. (ed.), Global Norms for the 21st Century. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 212-225.
A Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.Daniel A. Bell - 2005 - Analyse & Kritik 27 (2):215-238.
Derrida and Post-Modern Political Philosophy.James R. Muir - 2008 - The European Legacy 13 (4):425-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-25

Downloads
1 (#1,898,028)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references