Legally Recognizing Reproductive Coercion while Questioning Sexual Violence Exceptionalism

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):560-564 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While sexual violence should not be the prerequisite for legal abortion, expanding definitions of abuse to include reproductive coercion can open avenues of access to abortion following the Dobbs decision. Understanding the increased danger and compounding challenges of intimate partner violence can inform legislative initiatives, healthcare responses, and movements for reproductive justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent, Coercion, and Sexual Autonomy.Jeffrey Gauthier - 1999 - In Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-91.
Reproductive choice.Rebecca Bennett & John Harris - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 201–219.
Reproductive justice: Non‐interference or non‐domination?Himani Bhakuni - 2023 - Developing World Bioethics 23 (2):93-98.
Reproductive Freedom and Violence against Women: Where Are the Intersections?Lori L. Heise - 1993 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 21 (2):206-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
4 (#1,624,302)

6 months
4 (#790,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references