Etika Driyarkara Dan Relevansinya di Era Postmodern

Jurnal Filsafat 23 (1):77-98 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Driyarkara is an Indonesian philosopher who has original way of thinking. This paper aims to explore and analyze his ideas of moral and decency. According to Driyarkara, moral is a human need. Without moral, humanity will be in chaos. Based on Driyarkara's point of view, moral is a consequence of consciousness; therefore, having high moral standard is a human nature. Furthermore, conscience can be a moral standard for determining right or wrong as long as the conscience itself has not been “raped”. When conducting a moral consideration, every human has to use his own reason which is reflected in Driyarkara's Purity of Reason Dialectic. For him, all moral efforts show that human always want to achieve the perfection which is considered as God. The Driyarkara ethics could be classified as the deontological ethics. But it is the deontological ethics which has theological, humanist-naturalist, and axiological dimensions so that it can be defined as teleological as well. If we correlate the Driyarkara ethics and the Postmodern Era where morality has already been blurring, we can place the Driyarkara ethics which is considered teleological and deontological as a solid alternative of morality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bunga rampai mengenang Prof. Dr. N. Drijarkara S.J. dan pemikiran filosofisnya.N. Driyarkara & Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Driyarkara (eds.) - 1989 - Jakarta: Seksi Publikasi dan Seksi Ilmiah, Senat Mahasiswa STF Driyarkara.
The Structure of Virtue Ethics.Michele Lynn Svatos - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Darwin and Normative Ethics.John Mizzoni - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (3):275-285.
The Teleological and Deontological Structures of Action: Aristotle and/or Kant?Paul Ricoeur - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 21:99-111.
Moral Relativism.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (6):29-43.
La Teleologia dello Sviluppo Umano in Kant.Federica Trentani - 2019 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (1):231-246.
Virtue ethics and repugnant conclusions.Matt Zwolinski & David Schmidtz - 2005 - In Philip Cafaro & Ronald Sandler (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 107--17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Banin Diar Sukmono
University of Kansas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references