Graduate studies at Western
European Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):72–88 (2003)
|Abstract||But logic as it stands, e.g. in Principia Mathematica, can quite well be applied to our ordinary propositions; e.g. from ‘All men are mortal’ and ‘Socrates is a man’ there follows according to this logic ‘Socrates is mortal’, which is obviously correct, even though I equally obviously do not know what structure is possessed by the thing Socrates or the property of mortality. Here they just function as simple objects.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jinho Kang (2005). On the Composition of the Prototractatus. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):1–20.
Ian Proops (2004). Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
Peter Carruthers (1990). The Metaphysics of the Tractatus. Cambridge University Press.
M. W. Rowe (2007). Wittgenstein, Plato, and the Historical Socrates. Philosophy 82 (1):45-85.
Paul Wienpahl (1972). Wittgenstein's Blue and Brown Books (Part Two). Inquiry 15 (1-4):434 - 457.
Paul Wienpahl (1972). Wittgenstein's Blue and Brown Books (Part One). Inquiry 15 (1-4):267 – 319.
Anthony Kenny (2006). Wittgenstein. Blackwell Pub..
John A. Humphrey (1999). Quine, Kripke's Wittgenstein, Simplicity and Sceptical Solutions. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):43-55.
Dawn M. Phillips (2007). Complete Analysis and Clarificatory Analysis in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Michael Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,887 of 739,348 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,322 of 739,348 )
How can I increase my downloads?