The evolution of puritanical morality has not always served to strengthen cooperation, but to reinforce male dominance and exclude women

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e316 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Puritanical morality regulates a range of seemingly insignificant behaviors, including those involving human sexuality. A sizable portion of the latter particularly burdens women, who are held responsible for the moral conduct of men. In my paper, I show that these norms have not necessarily served to evolve cooperation, but to subjugate and eliminate women from public life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral emotions underlie puritanical morality.Ruida Zhu & Chao Liu - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e321.
Puritanical morality: Cooperation or coercion?Glenn Barenthin - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e294.
Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation.Peter DeScioli & Robert Kurzban - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e301.
Biological Markets, Cooperation, and the Evolution of Morality.Joeri Witteveen - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):401-430.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-05

Downloads
6 (#1,455,459)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
Evolutionary biology and feminism.Patricia Adair Gowaty - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (3):217-249.
[Book review] the racial contract. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):155-160.

Add more references