Mīrzā Malkam Khān and the idea of Method

Occidental Studies 10 (2):143-168 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this paper is to clarify that the distinction Malkam Khan makes between natural (ordinary) and scientific reason, is crucial to his entire thought, and he makes this distinction because he is aware of the critical status the idea of method has in the formation of the scientific reason. So, I try to prove that the idea of method and the distinction he makes between these two reasons are the same idea which is to be considered as his central idea. According to Malkam Khān, following the principles of this reason is the key to prosperity and progress. So, he believes that in order not to be colonized, we should progress, and in order to become prosperous, we should act according to the principles of scientific reason. On the basis of this analysis I claim that he thinks like a strategist, therefore, whenever we want to interpret his thought as a consistent whole, we should consider this particular approach. My own approach in this paper is in harmony with the main argument of Malkam Khān, trying to interpret his thought not on the basis of his personal character, his concealed intentions, or simple political events in which he was a part, but on the basis of seeing his thought as scientifically (objectively) as possible by focusing on his own writings in different stages of his thought-life, and analyzing them structurally.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thought Is Essentially An Action.Jaime J. Marcio - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (1):33-42.
Acting for reasons: Reply to Dancy. [REVIEW]John Hyman - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):358-368.
Urdu Letters of Mirza Asadu'llah Khan Ghalib.Carla R. Petievich, Daud Rahbar & Mirza Asadu'llah Khan Ghalib - 1991 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 111 (1):195.
Is public reason innocuous?Patrick Neal - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):131-152.
Reason and Faith—I.Renford Bambrough - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 31:23-32.
Reason and Faith—I.Renford Bambrough - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 31:23-32.
Collingwood's Historical Philosophy: A Systematic Appraisal.Gary F. Ciocco - 1994 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-28

Downloads
120 (#149,069)

6 months
52 (#86,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

M.T. Shahed Tabatabaei
University of Tehran
Morteza Tabatabaei
University of Religions and Denominations

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references