What’s Wrong With J.S. Mill’s “Harm-to-Others”-Principle?

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (1):1-26 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill on liberty.Ted Honderich - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
A paradox for weak deontology.Michael Huemer - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (4):464-477.
John Stuart Mill and Unassimilated Subjects.Mark Tunick - 2005 - Political Studies 53 (4):833-48.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Mill on duty and liberty.John Kilcullen - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):290 – 300.
J. S. mill and the american law of quarantine.Wendy E. Parmet - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):210-222.
The Enforcement of Morals Revisited.Richard J. Arneson - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):435-454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
81 (#205,337)

6 months
3 (#967,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Right Actions in Sport: Ethics for Contestants.Warren P. Fraleigh - 1984 - Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J.S. Mill.J. O. Urmson - 1953 - [Published for the Scots Philosophical Club by the University of St. Andrews].
Good Competition and Drug-Enhanced Performance.Robert L. Simon - 1984 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 11 (1):6-13.
The Penguin dictionary of philosophy.Thomas Mautner - 1997 - New York: Penguin Books.
Sports and Drugs: Are the Current Bans Justified?Michael Lavin - 1987 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 14 (1):34-43.

View all 17 references / Add more references