Adam and eve: A thought experiment
| Abstract | To simplify the relation between desire and morality, and between personal and moral good, we can imagine a world of only two people; let us call them Adam and Eve, for the sake of tradition. This gives us two types of personal good: good for Adam and good for Eve. What is good for Adam (or Eve) is what tends to realise his or her desires in general, and, where desires conflict, realises the desires that are stronger in the long-term. A benevolent and omniscient observer - let's call him Snake out of perversity - could therefore draw up two plans of action, one which is good for Adam and one which is good for Eve. However, at this point, Snake must choose sides, since obviously these goods are not always compatible. It is here that Snake must evolve into a moral being, since he must find a way to choose between good-for-Adam and good-for-Eve in order to produce a general good (even though we have not really decided what the general good might involve yet). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesThom Brooks (2007). The Fall Paradox. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):3-5.
Richard Arneson (2009). Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (01):113-.
Heleen Zorgdrager (2008). Adam and Eve in the Theology of Schleiermacher. In Hermann Patsch, Hans Dierkes, Terrence N. Tice & Wolfgang Virmond (eds.), Schleiermacher, Romanticism, and the Critical Arts: A Festschrift in Honor of Hermann Patsch. Edwin Mellen Press.
Matthew J. Kisner (2010). Perfection and Desire: Spinoza on the Good. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):97-117.
Adam Morton (2004). On Evil. Routledge.
Gerald O'Collins (2009). The Trial of Innocence: Adam, Eve, and the Yahwist. By André LaCocque. Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1007-1008.
Wes Morriston (2000). What is so Good About Moral Freedom? Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):344-358.
Henny Wenkart (1994). Feminist Revaluation of the Mythical Triad, Lilith, Adam, Eve. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):40-44.
Rachel Barney (2008). The Carpenter and the Good. In D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann & T. Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,343 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
